Skulle du vilja vara hygglig att översätta det fetade stycket till Thailändska eller Engelska-så att det inte blir några fel så lovar jag att maila över texten till Voranai och berätta för honom att det sitter en hummerfiskare på den svenska västkusten och vet varför han slutade skriva för Bangkok Post och började på GQ magazine-jag lovar att publicera hans svar här på MPR-förmodligen framkallar det bara ett gott skratt å hos honom...
Med tanke på IL:s mycket begränsade engelska-kunskaper (han visat här tidigare) duger nog Google-Translate bra:
My picture of what led to Voranai finished in the Bangkok Post that his situation there became untenable because of his opinions and articles before the coup, when the coup became a fact, he probably two things to choose from:
1. Stop writing negatively about the coup, junta dictatorship, follow the prompts from the junta and to voluntarily renounce the criticism that had hitherto been his hallmark, this would have been possible if he wanted to and could compromise his convictions and his conscience, this was according to data no viable option for Voranai.
2. To continue typing as usual Bangkok Post which, of course, had already been criticized for Voranais forthright and clear criticism of coups, juntas, and dictatorship, despite the junta's harsh censorship, governance and control of the media, which was supposed to both the Bangkok Post and Voranais situation have been unsustainable.
Voranai would probably have had to spend several weeks on the so-called "attitude adjustment" and risked being sentenced to imprisonment in a military court.
Bangkok Post would surely also have been hit and threatened with shutdown, what was there to do?
Voranai must obviously stop at the newspaper and this took the board according to him the decision.
Something like this has probably gone to, it's always difficult to form a 100% accurate picture of an event outside, but indications are enough anyway for a place like this event.
