Källkritik och selektivt läsande min käre IL! Riktigt kul att du än mer snurrar in dig. Kommer du någonsin lära dig.
Först; du hänvisar till historiska dokument. Om du ägnat någon tid åt nutida dokument så hade du sett att HRW, RSF etc har ALLA kraftiga synpunkter på att marionetten och hennes gäng ytterligare utökat LM.
Att hänvisa till historia är som att skjuta sig i huvudet. Man kan hänvisa till Mein Kampf och säga att det som stod där var jättebra. Med historien efter så ser man att det kanske inte var så himla bra. Förstår du?
Att du sedan hänvisar till International Viewpoint som ett sanningsvittnen; det är så dumt så blommorna vissnar. Snacka om partiska!
Låt oss börja med din första källa; http://www.internati...int.org/�� detta är enligt dom själva "International Viewpoint, the monthly English-language magazine of the Fourth International, is a window to radical alternatives world-wide, carrying reports, analysis and debates from all corners of the globe. Correspondents in over 50 countries report on popular struggles, and the debates that are shaping the left of tomorrow."
Nu läser vi lite om Fourth International;
" Ours is the Fourth International. The fourth, "Trotskyist", because the other three disappeared - by political abdication, or organisational collapse.
So far so good. But in fact the Fourth International has a much broader historical, theoretical and practical foundation.
A direct continuity with the socialist left which existed before the first world war, and the democratic communist left which existed afterwards. If citing our historical references helps clarify who we are, we identify with Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Rosa Luxemburg, V I Lenin and Leon Trotsky. The many others who have enriched our analysis and theoretical work include Tchernichevsky, Plekhanov, Hilferding, Otto Bauer, Gramsci, Georg Lukacs, Pannekoek, Alexandra Kollontai, Che Guevara, and our leading comrade Ernest Mandel, who passed away in 1995"
Hmmmm...något säger mig att här kan man ana viss partiskhet; kanske inte det mest sanningsvänliga organet att läsa.
Det ska jämföras med HRW, RSF och andra vilka startkt kritiserar nuvarnade gäng vid maktern för LM. Vi har all sett hur marionetten och hennes gäng konstant försvarar och utökar trycket med LM. Med den typ av underlag du hänvisra till så förstår jag att du är fullständigt indoktrinerad. Om du ämtar din sanning i sådana alster som denna så är det riktigt illa.
Jämför med HRW som skriver så här;
http://www.hrw.org/node/104582
The new government of Yingluck Shinawatra has not yet fulfilled early promises to give priority to Thailand’s many human rights problems. There has been little progress in holding to account those responsible for political violence in 2010 that killed 90 and injured 2,000. Thai authorities enforce censorship and prosecute activists using the Computer Crimes Act and lese majeste laws. In the southern border provinces, separatist insurgents attack civilians and target teachers in government-run schools, and government security forces torture and disappear persons with impunity. Thai authorities continue to ignore human rights abuses against migrant workers and pushed Rohingya asylum seekers arriving by boat back out to sea.
Jag ser HRW som en källa med högre trovärdighet än din angivna källa. Vad tycker du?
Som jag skrev ovan, om man anger rent kommunistiska källor med helt röda ögon, ja då förstår jag mer och mer om din situation i risbyn. Det måste vara dåligt med allmämploitiks aintryck däruppe. Lite insnöat kanske?
Hej
Själv har jag stort förtroende för HRW i såna här frågor och dom skrev det här riktat till Abhisit och hans regering http://www.hrw.org/node/98399/section/11 vid denna tidpunkt, och även FN och Amnesty var kritiska till den 1 500% ökningen av LM fall efter kuppen och under Apishits tid som PM.
Men jag tror inte att det hjälper att det är HRW som har skrivit denna rapport i ämnet, du vill nog helt enkelt förtränga och förtiga det faktum som denna rapport gör offentlig.
Lese Majeste Charges
Authorities have also used lese majeste charges under section 112 of the Thai Penal Code and the Computer-Related Crimes Act to arrest and prosecute UDD members and supporters.
Section 112 of the Penal Code states: "Whoever defames, insults or threatens the King, Queen, the Heir-apparent, or the Regent, shall be punished with imprisonment of three to 15 years." Neither the King nor any member of the royal family has ever personally filed a criminal complaint under this law.[279]
The Computer-Related Crimes Act broadly bundles lese majeste offenses under section 14, criminalizing any person who commits acts that involves import to a computer system of any computer data related with an offense against national security under the Penal Code; and any acts that involves the dissemination or forwarding of such computer data.
Under Prime Minister Abhisit’s government, there have reportedly been more than 35 active cases, dozens more accusations, and at least four persons jailed under lese majeste charges.[280] For example, on April 1, 2010, Central Investigation Bureau (CIB) police in Bangkok arrested Thanthawuth Thaweewarodom, known on the internet as “Red Eagle,” who had been actively involved in creating more than 10 pro-UDD websites under the umbrella of his “Red Thai” network.[281]The CIB accused Thanthawuth of designing and maintaining the banned Nor Por Chor USA websites (http://www.norporchorusa.com and http://www.norporchorusa2.com), which contain more critical material than websites in the “Red Thai” network, including video and audio broadcast by anti-monarchy activists that explicitly criticized the King, Queen, and other members of the royal family. He was charged with violating the Penal Code section 112 and the Computer-Related Crimes Act. On March 15, 2011, the Criminal Court sentenced him to 13 years in prison.[282]
On April 29, the DSI arrested UDD sympathizer Wipas Raksakulthai in Rayong province for committing lese majeste offenses and violating the Computer-Related Crimes Act. According to the DSI investigation, Wipas allegedly posted comments on his Facebook page on March 19, 2010, which strongly criticized the King and Queen.[283]
After dispersing the UDD protests, the armed forces stepped up measures to identify and prosecute so-called “watermelons” (members of the green-uniformed military who were “red” on the inside) who sided with, or were sympathetic to, the UDD, including those who posted their opinions online. Defense Minister Gen. Prawit Wongsuwan issued an order on October 28 ordering military units responsible for supervising internet use to immediately report anti-monarchy messages so those involved could be dishonorably discharged and prosecuted.[284]
On November 10, the air force announced that UDD supporter Sqn. Ldr. Chanin Khlaikhlung had been suspended from duties and put under investigation after he was found posting anti-monarchy comments on his Facebook page several times.[285] Sqn. Ldr. Chanin was charged with lese majeste offenses and computer-related crimes.[286]
Mvh isan Lover