Så kommer dom fram en efter en som stått bakom deras puppet suthep,
som jag sa för 5 månader sen så har denna man alltid varit involverad i allt hemskt som hänt Thailand dom senaste 30-40 åren
och även nu.
http://www.bangkokpost.com/most-recent/408891/pdrc-protesters-gather-at-major-tv-stations-govt-house
Stod inga namn i den länkade artikeln, så vem avser du står bakom allt hemskt som hänt i Thailand de senaste 30-40 åren?
Så kommer dom fram en efter en som stått bakom deras puppet suthep,
som jag sa för 5 månader sen så har denna man alltid varit involverad i allt hemskt som hänt Thailand dom senaste 30-40 åren
och även nu.
http://www.bangkokpost.com/most-recent/408891/pdrc-protesters-gather-at-major-tv-stations-govt-house
Nja, Sutheps chefer kommer du aldrig se i något demonstrationståg, de har andra uppgifter. Chamlong, Dr T's gamle mentor, är ingen chef utan en kackerlacka som nu vågar sig fram för att sola sig i glansen när han vet att segern redan är säkrad.
Stod inga namn i den länkade artikeln, så vem avser du står bakom allt hemskt som hänt i Thailand de senaste 30-40 åren?
klicka på länken så ser du
och en av dom som vart involverad i allt hemskt som hänt
Nja, Sutheps chefer kommer du aldrig se i något demonstrationståg, de har andra uppgifter. Chamlong, Dr T's gamle mentor, är ingen chef utan en kackerlacka som nu vågar sig fram för att sola sig i glansen när han vet att segern redan är säkrad.
ja sant dom högsta cheferna ser man aldrig, men denna kackerlacka borde sitta inspärrad på livstid, men är man i rätt familj och rik så slipper man sånt i Thailand
klicka på länken så ser du
och en av dom som vart involverad i allt hemskt som hänt
Menar du när han fällde militärdiktaturen 1992 och såg till att demokratin återupprättades eller att han var den som introducerade Thaksin Shinawatra i thailands politik?
Menar du när han fällde militärdiktaturen 1992 och såg till att demokratin återupprättades eller att han var den som introducerade Thaksin Shinawatra i thailands politik?
läser man hela hans historia så ser man helheten och vad han hela tiden är ute efter och vilken sida han står på, och ja många tycker väl att det var hemskt att han introducerade thaksin i thailands politik. och som både suthep, abhisit ocb thaksin får ta på sig liven 2010 så får han ta på sig liven 1992
läser man hela hans historia så ser man helheten och vad han hela tiden är ute efter och vilken sida han står på, och ja många tycker väl att det var hemskt att han introducerade thaksin i thailands politik. och som både suthep, abhisit ocb thaksin får ta på sig liven 2010 så får han ta på sig liven 1992
Ahhh, så det var Chamlong som satte in militären mot de obeväpnade demonstranterna och inte Thaksins affärskompisar general suchinda och Sunthorn. Sensationellt får jag säga, du harförstås bevis som backar upp dina påståenden?
Ahhh, så det var Chamlong som satte in militären mot de obeväpnade demonstranterna EH VA? och inte Thaksins affärskompisar general suchinda och Sunthorn. Sensationellt får jag säga, du harförstås bevis som backar upp dina påståenden?
han ledde protesterna så som thaksin gjorde 2010, så jag menar han är delaktig i dödsfallen så som thaksin är vid protesterna 2010fast det var suthep/abhisit som satte in militären.
och läs hela hans historia så inser man att han inte är någon goodguy
han ledde protesterna så som thaksin gjorde 2010, så jag menar han är delaktig i dödsfallen så som thaksin är vid protesterna 2010fast det var suthep/abhisit som satte in militären.
och läs hela hans historia så inser man att han inte är någon goodguy
Men vad gjorde han för 30-40 år sedan som var så illa om nu störtandet av en militärdiktatur 1992 räknas som dåligt. Upplys oss ovetande!
Men vad gjorde han för 30-40 år sedan som var så illa om nu störtandet av en militärdiktatur 1992 räknas som dåligt. Upplys oss ovetande!
okey jag skriver igen involverad i allt hemskt som hänt dom senaste 30-40 åren
Läs hans historia så blir du lite mer upplyst
han ledde protesterna så som thaksin gjorde 2010, så jag menar han är delaktig i dödsfallen så som thaksin är vid protesterna 2010fast det var suthep/abhisit som satte in militären.
och läs hela hans historia så inser man att han inte är någon goodguy
Bloody May
Main article: Black May (1992)
The truce was short-lived. On 17 May the two leading government parties announced that, while they supported the constitutional amendment, they also favored transitional clauses that would permit Suchinda to serve as prime minister for the life of the current Parliament. By that evening, 200,000 demonstrators filled Sanam Luang to call for Suchinda to resign. Chamlong led the protesters on a 2 km march to Government House. As they reached the intersection of Rachadamnoen andRachadamnoen Nok Avenues, they were halted atPhan Fa Bridge, which had been barricaded with razor wire by the police. After negotiations failed, some protesters stampeded and broke through the barricade. The police retaliated with water cannons and clubs after protesters tried to commandeer one of the fire trucks. Stones and molotov cocktailswere soon flying. Chamlong used a loudspeaker to exhort the marchers not to attack the police, but his words were lost in the unrest.
Over the next several hours, hundreds of troops arrived to quell the protest. Just after midnight, Suchinda declared a State of Emergency, making gatherings of more than ten people illegal. Chamlong remained near Phan Fa Bridge and the nearby Democracy Monument. Around 4:00 a.m., soldiers threatened the nearly 40,000 protesters by firing M16 rifles. An hour and a half later, they began firing again. Using a loudspeaker, Chamlong asked the soldiers to stop shooting. By the morning, the army moved more troops in, and crowds grew even larger at other sections of the city.
Early on the afternoon of 18 May, Suchinda publicly accused Chamlong of fomenting violence and defended the government’s use of force. Shortly later, troops, firing continuously in the air, moved in on the crowd surrounding Chamlong. The troops handcuffed and arrested Chamlong.
The crowds did not disperse, and the violence escalated. After government troops had secured the area around Phan Fa Bridge and the Democracy Monument, protests shifted to Ramkhamhaeng University across the city. By the evening of 19 May, some fifty thousand people had gathered there.
Royal intervention
Early on the morning of 20 May, Princess Sirindhornaddressed the country on television, calling for a stop to the unrest. Her appeal was rebroadcast throughout the day. In the evening, her brother, Crown Prince Vajiralongkorn, broadcast a similar public appeal. Then at 9:30 pm, a television broadcast of King Bhumibol, Suchinda, and Chamlong was shown, in which the King demanded that the two put an end to their confrontation and work together through parliamentary processes. Following the broadcast, Suchinda released Chamlong and announced an amnesty for protesters. He also agreed to support an amendment requiring the prime minister to be elected. Chamlong asked the demonstrators to disperse, which they did. On 24 May 1992, Suchinda resigned.
Chamlong later apologized for his role in the events: "I wanted a peaceful rally," he said afterwards. "I can’t deny some responsibility for the damage and loss of life. I feel deeply sorry for those families whose members were killed in the incident, for those people who were injured and their families." Nevertheless, he noted that "we were right in what we have done."
Chamlong Srimuang received the Ramon Magsaysay Award in the category of Government Service in 1992.[4]
Bloody May
Main article: Black May (1992)
The truce was short-lived. On 17 May the two leading government parties announced that, while they supported the constitutional amendment, they also favored transitional clauses that would permit Suchinda to serve as prime minister for the life of the current Parliament. By that evening, 200,000 demonstrators filled Sanam Luang to call for Suchinda to resign. Chamlong led the protesters on a 2 km march to Government House. As they reached the intersection of Rachadamnoen andRachadamnoen Nok Avenues, they were halted atPhan Fa Bridge, which had been barricaded with razor wire by the police. After negotiations failed, some protesters stampeded and broke through the barricade. The police retaliated with water cannons and clubs after protesters tried to commandeer one of the fire trucks. Stones and molotov cocktailswere soon flying. Chamlong used a loudspeaker to exhort the marchers not to attack the police, but his words were lost in the unrest.
Over the next several hours, hundreds of troops arrived to quell the protest. Just after midnight, Suchinda declared a State of Emergency, making gatherings of more than ten people illegal. Chamlong remained near Phan Fa Bridge and the nearby Democracy Monument. Around 4:00 a.m., soldiers threatened the nearly 40,000 protesters by firing M16 rifles. An hour and a half later, they began firing again. Using a loudspeaker, Chamlong asked the soldiers to stop shooting. By the morning, the army moved more troops in, and crowds grew even larger at other sections of the city.
Early on the afternoon of 18 May, Suchinda publicly accused Chamlong of fomenting violence and defended the government’s use of force. Shortly later, troops, firing continuously in the air, moved in on the crowd surrounding Chamlong. The troops handcuffed and arrested Chamlong.
The crowds did not disperse, and the violence escalated. After government troops had secured the area around Phan Fa Bridge and the Democracy Monument, protests shifted to Ramkhamhaeng University across the city. By the evening of 19 May, some fifty thousand people had gathered there.
Royal intervention
Early on the morning of 20 May, Princess Sirindhornaddressed the country on television, calling for a stop to the unrest. Her appeal was rebroadcast throughout the day. In the evening, her brother, Crown Prince Vajiralongkorn, broadcast a similar public appeal. Then at 9:30 pm, a television broadcast of King Bhumibol, Suchinda, and Chamlong was shown, in which the King demanded that the two put an end to their confrontation and work together through parliamentary processes. Following the broadcast, Suchinda released Chamlong and announced an amnesty for protesters. He also agreed to support an amendment requiring the prime minister to be elected. Chamlong asked the demonstrators to disperse, which they did. On 24 May 1992, Suchinda resigned.
Chamlong later apologized for his role in the events: "I wanted a peaceful rally," he said afterwards. "I can’t deny some responsibility for the damage and loss of life. I feel deeply sorry for those families whose members were killed in the incident, for those people who were injured and their families." Nevertheless, he noted that "we were right in what we have done."
Chamlong Srimuang received the Ramon Magsaysay Award in the category of Government Service in 1992.[4]
ja jag har läst det, wikipedia va? och han ledde protesterna
PAD leader Sondhi Limthongkul on protest stage at TV5 openly calling for military coup!
trevlig att han slipper fängelse för tagit över flygplatsen. 2009
och man glömmer inte:
By 1996, he had over US$600 million in assets. His business faced a meltdown following the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997, forcing him into bankruptcy and sparking investigations into irregular inter-company transactions. Immediately after the crisis, Sondhi furiously attacked the Democrat-led government over its management of the economic recovery. With the election of Thaksin Shinawatra as Prime Minister in 2001, several of Sondhi's associates became leaders in the new government. His banker, Viroj Nualkhair, became president of state-owned Krung Thai Bank and gave more than a billion baht in "debt forgiveness" to Sondhi, allowing him to emerge from bankruptcy. Sondhi became a vocal supporter of Thaksin, calling him "the best prime minister our country has ever had."[5]
Hahaha pengar styr dessa herrar
ja jag har läst det, wikipedia va? och han ledde protesterna
...och att leda protester mot en militärdiktatur är något dåligt i din värld?
📦 Den här tråden är arkiverad och går inte att svara på.