När röda är som ultra-royalister.

Arkiverad
noBuzz
17 maj 2012#1

"If you are one of those people who feel that a good number of red shirts have not really learnt to appreciate the true value of open criticism, you are not alone.

Perhaps they are not aware, but reds who are intolerant of criticism of Thaksin and of their other leaders are in a way very much similar to ultra-royalists who can bear nothing that is even mildly critical of the monarchy institution.

Years of political polarization means red shirts, as well as ultra-royalists yellow and multi-coloured shirts, think their group alone are absolutely right and so there is no need to take in any from outside or engage in open self-criticism-cum-introspection.

Reds who can’t take criticism or appreciate the value of criticism in a democratic society can’t seriously claim to be fighting for democracy. And if some of these reds do not stop calling themselves fighters for democracy, they will simply be doing a disservice to the notion of democracy itself, which at any rate is already a very loaded term in Thai politics since you can also claim to be staging a military coup for democracy.

Years of each over-exposure to their own political media means to some reds (as well as yellow and multi-coloured shirts) are used to only one-sided news and information about their leaders and movement. They also grew increasingly suspicious of anyone who criticized their leaders, thinking that there must be a deeper reason or conspiracy. This is just like ultra-royalists who believe that those who voiced opposition to the draconian lese majeste law must all be seeking to sow rift in society and part of a conspiracy to overthrow the monarchy - real or imagined.

That’s the danger of over consumption of one-sided information and complete adoration of someone, be it the King, Thaksin or Nattawut.

It is most ironic that these red shirts who can’t bear to listen to criticism of Thaksin and Nattawut would dislike ultra-royalists so much for their fondness of one-sided ‘positive-only’ information about the Thai monarchy.

But why?

Could it be that they are so used to adoring someone, so when they no longer adore the King and Queen, they would have to seek to adore someone else like Thaksin instead? By the way, portraits of Thaksin can be found hanging on the walls of a good number of rural red shirts’ homes, that it reminds me of the pictures of the King and Queen.

It’s unclear what percentage of red shirts are intolerant of criticism but it constitutes a serious challenge to the red-shirt movement in particular and Thai society in general.

Thailand can’t afford to have so many political groups being intolerant of criticism if, especially if all of them claim to be wishing for a genuine democracy."

[size=3]__________________________________________________________[/size]

[size=3]Se där? Bra artikel. [/size]

[size=3]Hela artikeln på http://prachatai.com/english/node/3188.[/size]

MaiChai
17 maj 2012#2

Som sagt, redshirts är lika hjärntvättade som rojalisterna. Intressant inlägg från Prachathai men det faller nog inte alla på läppen...

noBuzz
17 maj 2012#3

Som sagt, redshirts är lika hjärntvättade som rojalisterna. Intressant inlägg från Prachathai men det faller nog inte alla på läppen...

Japp, i alla fall vissa av rödskjortorna.

Tycker att inlägget är väldigt intressant av flera anledningar. Dels eftersom Prachathai enligt många varit ganska pro-thaksin,

Något som motståndare till Prachathai menat bero på att man är finansierad av internationella bankirer på Thaksins sida.

Det här inlägget tyder ju inte riktigt på att den teorin är 100%. :)

Å andra sidan, om det är så som motståndarna fantiserat ihop, så betyder artikeln i sådana fall att Thaksinisterna börjat försöka desarmera rödskjortorna.

Vilket iofs kan förklaras av att man reagerar på den kritik man börjat få från vissa UDD-håll.

Det börjar finnas en hel del mer och mer att spekulera i. :nyam:

Om man nu ska dra lite höga växlar av EN artikel i Prachathai förstås.

📦 Den här tråden är arkiverad och går inte att svara på.